Skip to Main Content

Northwell/ZSOM Systematic Review

Create a Protocol

Systematic reviews and scoping reviews should have a protocol which helps to plan and outline the study methodology. The protocol should include:

  • Search question or objective
  • Key questions broken into PICO (or other structured research question) components
  • Inclusion/exclusion criteria (scope including types of studies, participants, interventions)
  • Proposed search strategy for published/unpublished literature
  • Methodology for data extraction and analysis
  • Assessment of methodological quality/risk of bias of individual studies (not required for scoping reviews)
  • Data synthesis
  • Grading the evidence for each key question
  • Time- frame

Why should you complete a protocol?

  • A protocol is your planning document and roadmap for the project. It allows you to complete a systematic review/scoping review efficiently and accurately, ensures greater understanding among team members, and makes writing the manuscript easier.
  • Many journals now require submitted systematic reviews to have registered protocols.
  • The PRISMA Reporting Standard lists information about the systematic review protocol as an "essential element" (PRISMA 2020 Item 24)
  • The Cochrane Handbook, The Institute of Medicine Standards, and others, all list completing a protocol as one of the important steps to a successful systematic review.

Protocol Registries and Resources

The Campbell Collaboration is an international research network that produces systematic reviews of the effects of social interventions in Crime & Justice, Education, International Development, and Social Welfare.

Information on proposing and registering a systematic review protocol with Cochrane Reviews..

PROSPERO is an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care. PROSPERO aims to provide a comprehensive listing of systematic reviews registered at inception to help avoid unplanned duplication and enable comparison of reported review methods with what was planned in the protocol.

Can be used across many review types (i.e., scoping review, review of qualitative studies, meta-analysis, or any other type of review)

Figshare is an online open access repository where researchers can preserve and share their research outputs, including figures, datasets, images, and videos. It is free to upload content and free to access, in adherence to the principle of open data.

  • BMJ Open 
    Publishes scoping review and systematic review protocols 
  • Protocols.io
    Create, preserve, and share full protocols of your research.

Resources to help authors prepare a protocol for a systematic or scoping review:

  • Madelon van Wely, Julie M Hastings, Basil Tarlatzis, Arne Sunde, Is it new, is it true and do we care—the role of prospective review registration, Human Reproduction Update, Volume 29, Issue 5, September-October 2023, Pages 519–520, https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad022
  • Pieper D, Rombey T. Where to prospectively register a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 8;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01877-1. PMID: 34998432; PMCID: PMC8742923. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34998432/ 
Hofstra University

This site is compliant with the W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY Hempstead, NY 11549-1000 (516) 463-6600 © 2000-2024 Hofstra University